Vulnerabilities

With the aim of informing, warning and helping professionals with the latest security vulnerabilities in technology systems, we have made a database available for users interested in this information, which is in Spanish and includes all of the latest documented and recognised vulnerabilities.

This repository, with over 75,000 registers, is based on the information from the NVD (National Vulnerability Database) – by virtue of a partnership agreement – through which INCIBE translates the included information into Spanish.

On occasions this list will show vulnerabilities that have still not been translated, as they are added while the INCIBE team is still carrying out the translation process. The CVE  (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) Standard for Information Security Vulnerability Names is used with the aim to support the exchange of information between different tools and databases.

All vulnerabilities collected are linked to different information sources, as well as available patches or solutions provided by manufacturers and developers. It is possible to carry out advanced searches, as there is the option to select different criteria to narrow down the results, some examples being vulnerability types, manufacturers and impact levels, among others.

Through RSS feeds or Newsletters we can be informed daily about the latest vulnerabilities added to the repository. Below there is a list, updated daily, where you can discover the latest vulnerabilities.

CVE-2025-12904

Publication date:
14/11/2025
The SNORDIAN's H5PxAPIkatchu plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'insert_data' AJAX endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 0.4.17 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2025-13097

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 136.0.7103.59 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2025-13102

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in WebApp Installs in Google Chrome on Android prior to 134.0.6998.35 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2025-13107

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in Compositing in Google Chrome prior to 140.0.7339.80 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-11920

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in Dawn in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 130.0.6723.92 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-13178

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in Fullscreen in Google Chrome prior to 128.0.6613.84 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-13983

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in Lens in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 136.0.7103.59 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted QR code. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-7017

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.182 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-7021

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in Autofill in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 124.0.6367.60 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-9126

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Use after free in Internals in Google Chrome on iOS prior to 127.0.6533.88 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to potentially exploit heap corruption via a series of curated UI gestures. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2024-11919

Publication date:
14/11/2025
Inappropriate implementation in Intents in Google Chrome on Android prior to 129.0.6668.58 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025

CVE-2025-64530

Publication date:
13/11/2025
Apollo Federation is an architecture for declaratively composing APIs into a unified graph. A vulnerability in versions of Apollo Federation's composition logic prior to 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 allowed some queries to Apollo Router to improperly bypass access controls on types/fields. Apollo Federation incorrectly allowed user-defined access control directives on interface types/fields, which could be bypassed by instead querying the implementing object types/fields in Apollo Router via inline fragments, for example. A fix to versions 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 of composition logic in Federation now disallows interfaces types and fields to contain user-defined access control directives. Some workarounds are available. Users of Apollo Rover with an unpatched composition version or are using the Apollo Studio build pipeline with Federation version 2.8 or below should manually copy the access control requirements on interface types/fields to each implementing object type/field where appropriate. Do not remove those access control requirements from the interface types/fields, as unpatched Apollo Composition will not automatically generate them in the supergraph schema. Customers not using Apollo Router access control features (`@authenticated`, `@requiresScopes`, or `@policy` directives) or not specifying access control requirements on interface types/fields are not affected and do not need to take action.
Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis
Last modification:
14/11/2025