Vulnerabilities

With the aim of informing, warning and helping professionals with the latest security vulnerabilities in technology systems, we have made a database available for users interested in this information, which is in Spanish and includes all of the latest documented and recognised vulnerabilities.

This repository, with over 75,000 registers, is based on the information from the NVD (National Vulnerability Database) – by virtue of a partnership agreement – through which INCIBE translates the included information into Spanish.

On occasions this list will show vulnerabilities that have still not been translated, as they are added while the INCIBE team is still carrying out the translation process. The CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) Standard for Information Security Vulnerability Names is used with the aim to support the exchange of information between different tools and databases.

All vulnerabilities collected are linked to different information sources, as well as available patches or solutions provided by manufacturers and developers. It is possible to carry out advanced searches, as there is the option to select different criteria to narrow down the results, some examples being vulnerability types, manufacturers and impact levels, among others.

Through RSS feeds or Newsletters we can be informed daily about the latest vulnerabilities added to the repository. Below there is a list, updated daily, where you can discover the latest vulnerabilities.

CVE-2025-6613

Publication date:

25/06/2025

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in PHPGurukul Hospital Management System 4.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /doctor/manage-patient.php. The manipulation of the argument Name leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Severity CVSS v4.0: MEDIUM

Last modification:

02/07/2025

CVE-2025-41256

Publication date:

25/06/2025

Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improper handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), since the certificate fingerprint is stored as SHA-1, although SHA-1 is considered weak. This issue affects Cyberduck: through 9.1.6; Mountain Duck: through 4.17.5.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2025-41647

Publication date:

25/06/2025

A local, low-privileged attacker can learn the password of the connected controller in PLC Designer V4 due to an incorrect implementation that results in the password being displayed in plain text under special conditions.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2025-49797

Publication date:

25/06/2025

Multiple Brother driver installers for Windows contain a privilege escalation vulnerability. If exploited, an arbitrary program may be executed with the administrative privilege. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the respective vendors listed under [References].

Severity CVSS v4.0: HIGH

Last modification:

19/08/2025

CVE-2025-41255

Publication date:

25/06/2025

Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improperly handle TLS certificate pinning for untrusted certificates (e.g., self-signed), unnecessarily installing it to the Windows Certificate Store of the current user without any restrictions. This issue affects Cyberduck through 9.1.6 and Mountain Duck through 4.17.5.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2024-51984

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An authenticated attacker can reconfigure the target device to use an external service (such as LDAP or FTP) controlled by the attacker. If an existing password is present for an external service, the attacker can force the target device to authenticate to an attacker controlled device using the existing credentials for that external service. In the case of an external LDAP or FTP service, this will disclose the plaintext password for that external service to the attacker.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2024-51981

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2024-51982

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An unauthenticated attacker who can connect to TCP port 9100 can issue a Printer Job Language (PJL) command that will crash the target device. The device will reboot, after which the attacker can reissue the command to repeatedly crash the device. A malformed PJL variable FORMLINES is set to a non number value causing the target to crash.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2024-51983

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An unauthenticated attacker who can connect to the Web Services feature (HTTP TCP port 80) can issue a WS-Scan SOAP request containing an unexpected JobToken value which will crash the target device. The device will reboot, after which the attacker can reissue the command to repeatedly crash the device.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2024-51978

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An unauthenticated attacker who knows the target device&#39;s serial number, can generate the default administrator password for the device. An unauthenticated attacker can first discover the target device&#39;s serial number via CVE-2024-51977 over HTTP/HTTPS/IPP, or via a PJL request, or via an SNMP request.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

25/07/2025

CVE-2024-51979

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An authenticated attacker may trigger a stack based buffer overflow by performing a malformed request to either the HTTP service (TCP port 80), the HTTPS service (TCP port 443), or the IPP service (TCP port 631). The malformed request will contain an empty Origin header value and a malformed Referer header value. The Referer header value will trigger a stack based buffer overflow when the host value in the Referer header is processed and is greater than 64 bytes in length.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

CVE-2024-51980

Publication date:

25/06/2025

An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment.

Severity CVSS v4.0: Pending analysis

Last modification:

26/06/2025

Subscribe to Vulnerabilities