Vulnerabilidades

Con el objetivo de informar, advertir y ayudar a los profesionales sobre las últimas vulnerabilidades de seguridad en sistemas tecnológicos, ponemos a disposición de los usuarios interesados en esta información una base de datos con información en castellano sobre cada una de las últimas vulnerabilidades documentadas y conocidas.

Este repositorio con más de 75.000 registros esta basado en la información de NVD (National Vulnerability Database) – en función de un acuerdo de colaboración – por el cual desde INCIBE realizamos la traducción al castellano de la información incluida. En ocasiones este listado mostrará vulnerabilidades que aún no han sido traducidas debido a que se recogen en el transcurso del tiempo en el que el equipo de INCIBE realiza el proceso de traducción.

Se emplea el estándar de nomenclatura de vulnerabilidades CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), con el fin de facilitar el intercambio de información entre diferentes bases de datos y herramientas. Cada una de las vulnerabilidades recogidas enlaza a diversas fuentes de información así como a parches disponibles o soluciones aportadas por los fabricantes y desarrolladores. Es posible realizar búsquedas avanzadas teniendo la opción de seleccionar diferentes criterios como el tipo de vulnerabilidad, fabricante, tipo de impacto entre otros, con el fin de acortar los resultados.

Mediante suscripción RSS o Boletines podemos estar informados diariamente de las últimas vulnerabilidades incorporadas al repositorio.

CVE-2026-80349

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** TarsWeb decides whether a request comes from a trusted local caller using a client-controlled header. app.js sets Koa&#39;s proxy option to true without naming which upstream proxies may be trusted and without limiting the number of forwarded hops, so the request address Koa reports is taken from the X-Forwarded-For header supplied by the caller. In midware/ssoMidware.js a single branch covers both the ignored-path list and the ignoreIps allowlist from config/loginConf.js, which contains the loopback address, and that branch assigns the effective account identity from the uid query parameter before falling through to the request without validating any ticket, cookie or password. A request carrying a forged X-Forwarded-For value naming the loopback address and a uid naming an existing account therefore reaches every route the console mounts as that account, including an administrator, with no credential of any kind. Those routes include user and role administration, service configuration, and package upload and deployment. Version 3.0.16 separates the two branches so that a match on the address allowlist assigns the configured default account rather than one named by the caller.

Gravedad CVSS v4.0: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

26/08/2026

CVE-2026-80350

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** OneUptime&#39;s webhook target check rejects private and loopback addresses given in IPv4 form and a small set of IPv6 forms, but has no case for the IPv4-mapped IPv6 range. The webhook delivery path calls SSRFProtection.validateWebhookTargetIsSafe, and the host-literal screening inside Common/Server/Utils/SSRFProtection.ts, performed by isBlockedHostnameLiteral, rejects private and loopback IPv4 ranges and tests an IPv6 value against the unspecified address, the loopback, the link-local prefix and the unique-local prefixes. A value such as [::ffff:127.0.0.1] matches none of them. The value is also recognised as an address literal rather than a name, so the path that re-checks addresses obtained from resolution is not taken. The HTTP client treats the mapped form as the embedded IPv4 address and connects to it, so an authenticated project member who can configure a webhook can direct the server at loopback services, private network ranges and link-local metadata endpoints, and the response is recorded where the webhook result can be read. Version 12.0.7 adds handling for the mapped range.

Gravedad CVSS v4.0: ALTA

Última modificación:

26/08/2026

CVE-2026-80348

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** TarsWeb enforces its per-application roles by calling AuthService from individual controller methods, and four methods in app/controller/patch/PatchController.js make no such call. uploadAndPublish accepts a package upload and then builds and dispatches a deployment task to every server matching the supplied application and module name, while its sibling uploadPatchPackage, which only stores the package, does check developer authorization first. The only precondition uploadAndPublish enforces is that the named server is registered, and any registered server in the installation satisfies it. downloadPackage and deletePatchPackage select a package by an unscoped sequential primary key covering every application&#39;s uploads, and setPatchPackageDefault changes which package a given application deploys by default. Any authenticated account, including one holding a role scoped to a single unrelated application, can therefore push a package to and trigger its deployment on any server the console manages, retrieve or delete any other application&#39;s package, and change which package is deployed by default.

Gravedad CVSS v4.0: ALTA

Última modificación:

26/08/2026

CVE-2026-80347

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** mcp-fetch checks a fetch target against its SSRF guard without removing the brackets that surround an IPv6 literal. isSafeUrl reads the hostname from the parsed URL, which for a literal such as http://[::1]/ yields the bracketed string, and then tests it with net.isIP. That call returns zero for a bracketed value, so the branch holding the private-address checks is skipped entirely. The guard falls back to resolving the hostname, the bracketed string is not a resolvable name, no addresses are returned, and the target is reported safe. The HTTP client then strips the brackets and connects. Because the address may be given in IPv4-mapped form, the same path reaches any IPv4 target the loopback and private checks were meant to exclude, including link-local metadata endpoints. isPrivateIPv6 also has no case for the ::ffff: prefix, so the mapped form would still pass even if the brackets were removed. The fetch target is supplied as a tool argument, so an attacker who can influence what the model requests can read internal responses back into the model context.

Gravedad CVSS v4.0: ALTA

Última modificación:

26/08/2026

CVE-2026-80346

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** StarRocks performs no privilege check when a legacy synchronous materialized view is dropped. Every other statement type routed through AuthorizerStmtVisitor calls into Authorizer before execution, but visitDropMaterializedViewStatement returns immediately with a comment stating the check happens in execution logic. That holds only for asynchronous materialized views: LocalMetastore.dropMaterializedView calls Authorizer.checkMaterializedViewAction inside a branch taken when the resolved table is a MaterializedView. A legacy synchronous materialized view is stored as a rollup index on an OlapTable rather than a MaterializedView, so the other branch runs, reaching AlterJobMgr.processDropMaterializedView and MaterializedViewHandler, neither of which contains any Authorizer call. The former locates the target by scanning every OlapTable in the named database for a matching rollup index, and the latter validates only table state and name conflicts. Any authenticated account can therefore drop a legacy synchronous materialized view belonging to any database, holding no grant on the view, the base table or the database, and the drop is indistinguishable from an authorized one.

Gravedad CVSS v4.0: ALTA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

CVE-2026-77541

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in UniFi Network Application to escalate privileges within the UniFi Network Application.

Gravedad CVSS v3.1: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

CVE-2026-77542

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UID Enterprise Agent to execute a Command Injection on the host device.

Gravedad CVSS v3.1: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

CVE-2026-77543

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Access Application to execute a Command Injection on the host device.

Gravedad CVSS v3.1: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

CVE-2026-77545

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** A malicious actor with access to the network, low privileges and under certain conditions could exploit an Active Debug Code vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.

Gravedad CVSS v3.1: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

CVE-2026-59683

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** The OpenRGB network protocol allows to write attacker controlled strings into arbitrary file system paths (extension of CVE-2026-59682). This allows either a full system compromise from local or remote (if the daemon is running as root) or a full account takeover (if the daemon is running in user context).

Gravedad CVSS v4.0: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

26/08/2026

CVE-2026-77534

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** A malicious actor with access to the network and low privileges could exploit an Improper Access Control vulnerability found in certain devices running UniFi OS to escalate privileges within such UniFi OS devices or instances.

Gravedad CVSS v3.1: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

CVE-2026-77535

Fecha de publicación:

26/08/2026

Idioma:

Inglés

*** Pendiente de traducción *** A malicious actor with access to the network and high privileges could exploit an Improper Input Validation vulnerability found in UniFi Network Application to execute a Command Injection on an adopted device.

Gravedad CVSS v3.1: CRÍTICA

Última modificación:

28/08/2026

Suscribirse a Vulnerabilidades